Braj Mohan Chaturvedi

Total Business Management

  • Your Visits

    • 10,701 Visits
  • This Blog is dedicated to all the Management Professionals who want to challenge the set pattern, who are practical in their approach and dont think in thin air; who believe that strategy is all about making things simple; who strongly advocate the “Rule of Simple” and who believe that impossible is nothing. - Just like Katyayana. Katyayana was a disciple of Gautama Buddha. He is also known as Kaccana or Kaccayana, Mahakatyayana, Mahakaccana and in Japanese as Kasennen. Katyayana is one of the “Ten Disciples of the Buddha”. Mahakashyapa, Ananda, Shariputra, Subhuti, Purna, Mahamaudgalyayana, Katyayana, Aniruddha, Upali and Rahula. He was foremost in explaining Dharma. He was born in a brahmin family at Ujjayini (Ujjain) and received a classical Brahminical education studying the Vedas. Katyayana was a Sanskrit grammarian, mathematician and Vedic priest who lived in ancient India, around the time of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom. He is known for two works:- The Varttika, an elaboration on Panini’s grammar. Along with the Maha-bhasya of Patanjali, this text became a core part of the vyakarana (grammar) canon. This was one of the six Vedangas, and constituted compulsory education for Brahman students in the following twelve centuries.- He also composed one of the later Sulba Sutras, a series of nine texts on the geometry of altar constructions, dealing with rectangles, right-sided triangles, rhombuses, etc. Katyayana certainly have been a man of very considerable learning but probably not interested in mathematics for its own sake, merely interested in using it for religious purposes.He wrote the Sulbasutra to provide rules for religious rites and to improve and expand on the rules which had been given by his predecessors. Katyayana would have been a priest instructing the people in the ways of conducting the religious rites he describes. Authorship: Nettipakarana, a work of grammar, and Petakopadesa, a treatise on exegetical methodology, sulvasutras dealt with geometry.

Learning for Brand Slaves

Posted by Braj Chaturvedi on May 11, 2009

A brand behaves like human. It has personality, identity, emotion, and life cycle. A brand manager who manages the brand (In my views company and brand manager can’t own the brand; they just own product) is responsible to bring back life into the dying brands.

The customer who owns the brand has become increasingly sensitive towards their brands. If the brand is not behaving the way they want them to behave they simply dump it. The customers want brand to add value to their lifestyle. They want brand to be their lifestyle statement. (Not to forget that gone are the days when consumers had limited choices; today she can choose from competing brands.)

Pepsi and Coca-Cola recognized the turmoil in the Indian carbonated soft drink market that followed the environmentalists protesting against the cola companies, claiming it to be harmful for health. The companies were quick enough to respond through its brand ambassadors. The quick response of the Coca companies help them projecting that they are safe and healthy brand. The cola companies managed to retain the brand health, and brand identity.

The brand slaves – the brand managers and the company – have to work harder to find the ways to retain the brand in the minds of the audience. They can position, reposition brands to match the customers need and requirements.

As the brand traverses through different stages of its life cycle, brand slaves need to transform the brand just not make some aesthetic changes. The Pepsi has positioned itself as a the product for youngistan with disassociated association from cricket and movie, on the other hand the rival camp Coca-Cola seems to have taken the movie and cricket positioning. In both the cases it is complete new brand positioning. In my views the brands stop to capture the minds of the consumer when the brand slaves starts to concentrate on the competition and bring about cosmetic changes in the brand and ignore the brand identity. The Pepsi and Coca-Cola both the companies play intelligently on the reinventing the message and counterattacking the competition on the message.

The cola companies – Pepsi and Coca-Cola – in India have not changed the brand’s core value, which has helped them retain the brand owners’ faith on them. The classic coke case scary result always comes to the rescue of the current generation brand slaves at Pepsi and Coca-Cola and help them not take brand owners casually and playing around with the brand owners emotions.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.